Breadcrumb

Audit of the Non-Recurring Maintenance Program

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
13-00589-137
VISN
State
Arizona
Arkansas
Florida
Iowa
Michigan
New York
Puerto Rico
Tennessee
District
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
Office of Management (OM)
Report Author
Office of Audits and Evaluations
Report Type
Audit
Recommendations
8
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
OIG conducted this audit to access how effectively Veterans Health Administration’s (VHA’s) Non-Recurring Maintenance (NRM) Program addressed its most significant maintenance needs. Expenditures increased from about $824 million in FY 2008 to $1.8 billion in FY 2013. During this same period, VHA’s reported their facility maintenance backlog increased from $7.2 billion to $10.7 billion. We found that VHA needs to increase the effectiveness of its NRM program. VA established an annual goal of reducing its overall maintenance backlog by 9.5 percent and had reasonable assurance that the NRM program funds were used for allowable NRM purposes. However, VHA did not have an adequate process to track how much of the over $1.8 billion NRM funds the medical facilities spent to address it’s nearly $10.7 billion identified facility maintenance backlog. VHA’s Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) inadequately assessed risks to patient safety and underestimated repair costs by $12.3 billion. Lastly, 74 of the 150 NRM construction projects reviewed were not completed within 1 year of their initial planned completion date. This occurred because VHA did not have an adequate process to track their NRM project expenses and adequately monitor expected results. VHA’s FCA did not assess patient safety risks and provide reasonable cost estimates for identified maintenance deficiencies. Additionally, VHA does not routinely monitor NRM project schedules. As a result, VHA has not been able to adequately identify how it is using NRM funds to achieve program goals or ensure projects are prioritized to correct significant maintenance deficiencies, including serious patient safety issues. In addition, VHA cannot ensure that their annual NRM budget requests are accurate or that they are taking timely corrective actions on NRM projects that miss project milestones. We recommended the Under Secretary for Health, the Executive in Charge for the Office of Management and Chief Financial Officer, and the Principal Executive Director, Office of Acquisition, Logistics, and Construction, standardize NRM accounting procedures, provide program guidance, assign risk levels, estimate more accurate repair costs, and monitor NRM project milestones. VA officials concurred with our recommendations and submitted acceptable corrective action plans.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
We recommend the Under Secretary for Health establish a process to track VA medical facilities' expenditure of NRM funds toward addressing the maintenance backlog.
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
We recommend the Under Secretary for Health establish procedures to ensure VA medical facilities projects address the Facility Condition Assessment deficiencies as approved under the Strategic Capital Investment Plan.
No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
We recommend the Under Secretary for Health establish procedures to identify non-recurring maintenance projects that are not meeting milestones to ensure that timely corrective actions are taken.
No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
We recommend the Under Secretary for Health develop clearly defined criteria for assigning risk levels to building infrastructure systems reviewed by Facility Condition Assessment contractors.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
We recommend the Executive in Charge for the Office of Management and Chief Financial Officer increase financial accountability by implementing standardized accounting procedures for tracking NRM projects' financial performance.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
We recommend the Principal Executive Director, Office of Acquisition, Logistics and Construction instruct contract engineers to assign risk levels to identified maintenance deficiencies based on VHA criteria.
No. 7
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
We recommend the Principal Executive Director, Office of Acquisition, Logistics, and Construction review Facility Condition Assessment estimating processes and procedures to ensure compliance with industry best practices.
No. 8
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
We recommend the Principal Executive Director, Office of Acquisition, Logistics, and Construction review historical project costs to determine an effective adjustment factor to better estimate contract costs to complete the repair of identified maintenance deficiencies.