Breadcrumb

Follow-up Review of VA’s Veterans Benefits Management System

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
13-00690-455
VA Office
Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA)
Information and Technology (OIT)
Report Author
Office of Audits and Evaluations
Report Type
Audit
Recommendations
9
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
In February 2013, we reported VA could not provide reasonable assurance the Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS) would meet its goals of increasing claims processing accuracy to 98 percent and eliminating the disability claims backlog by 2015. We conducted this follow-up review to determine how effectively VA is managing cost, performance, and schedule of VBMS development to meet its claims processing accuracy and backlog elimination goals. VA remained partially effective in managing VBMS development to help meet claims processing accuracy and backlog elimination goals. However, since September 2009, total estimated VBMS costs increased significantly from about $579.2 million to approximately $1.3 billion in January 2015. The increases were due to inadequate cost control, unplanned changes in system and business requirements, and inefficient contracting practices. As a result, VA could not ensure an effective return on its investment and total actual VBMS system development costs remained unknown. Amid evolving requirements, VBMS did not fully provide the capability to process claims from initial application to benefits delivery. Users lacked training needed to leverage the enhanced functionality provided. System response-time issues resulted from rapid software enhancements while system disruptions were due to inadequate service continuity practices. Until these issues are addressed, VA will continue to lack assurance of meeting its claims processing accuracy and backlog elimination goals by the end of 2015. We recommended the Executive in Charge of Information and Technology, in conjunction with the Under Secretary for Benefits, define and stabilize system and business requirements, address system performance problems, deploy required functionality to process claims end-to-end, and institute metrics needed to identify and ensure progress toward meeting stated goals.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Not Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA),Information and Technology (OIT)
We recommended the Executive in Charge for the Office of Information and Technology, in conjunction with the Under Secretary for Benefits, implement improved cost controls and stabilize Veterans Benefits Management System functionality requirements for the remainder of planned system development to restrict further cost increases.
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA),Information and Technology (OIT)
We recommended the Executive in Charge for the Office of Information and Technology, in conjunction with the Under Secretary for Benefits, perform a formal budget versus cost analysis to identify actual costs expended in support of the Veterans Benefits Management System development effort.
No. 3
Not Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'
to Information and Technology (OIT)
We recommended the Executive in Charge for the Office of Information and Technology perform market analyses on all future Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Atlantic task orders to determine whether the continued use of the interagency agreements is in the best interest of the Department.
No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA),Information and Technology (OIT)
We recommended the Executive in Charge for the Office of Information and Technology, in conjunction with the Under Secretary for Benefits, establish a clear strategy and plan to decommission legacy systems, eliminate redundant systems operations, and reduce system maintenance costs.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA),Information and Technology (OIT)
We recommended the Executive in Charge for the Office of Information and Technology, in conjunction with the Under Secretary for Benefits, fully develop and implement Veterans Benefits Management System electronic workflow and workload brokering functionality to facilitate more efficient claims processing.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA),Information and Technology (OIT)
We recommended the Executive in Charge for the Office of Information and Technology, in conjunction with the Under Secretary for Benefits, provide adequate training with each Veterans Benefits Management System release to ensure VA Regional Office users fully benefit from the enhanced functionality provided.
No. 7
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Information and Technology (OIT)
We recommended the Executive in Charge for the Office of Information and Technology implement an improved Veterans Benefits Management System network infrastructure to mitigate single points of failure and reduce the network performance issues across the enterprise.
No. 8
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA),Information and Technology (OIT)
We recommended the Executive in Charge for the Office of Information and Technology, in conjunction with the Under Secretary for Benefits, develop sufficient Veterans Benefits Management System performance metrics to demonstrate the system is improving VA¿s ability to efficiently process claims as compared to legacy practices.
No. 9
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Information and Technology (OIT)
We recommended the Executive in Charge for the Office of Information and Technology minimize the use of manual requirements tracking processes and maximize the use of automated application lifecycle management tools to manage requirements traceability in accordance with industry best practices.
Total Monetary Impact of All Recommendations
Open: $ 0.00
Closed: $ 27,000,000.00