Breadcrumb

Healthcare Inspection – Reported Primary Care Staffing at St. Cloud VA Health Care System, Veterans Integrated Service Network 23, Eagan, Minnesota

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
15-05490-367
VISN
State
Minnesota
District
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Report Author
Office of Healthcare Inspections
Report Type
Hotline Healthcare Inspection
Recommendations
1
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
OIG conducted an inspection to assess allegations made regarding a September 14, 2015 letter from Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 23 Acting Director to Congressman Timothy J. Walz (VISN 23 Response 2) concerning primary care at the St. Cloud VA Health Care System (facility), St. Cloud, MN. While we substantiated that part of the VISN 23 Response 2 did not accurately represent facility gains and losses of physicians and mid-level providers, it appeared to be an inadvertent error. We substantiated that VISN 23 Response 2 inaccurately represented primary care provider panel sizes at the facility. The reported facility average primary care panel size was based upon a simple average of panel sizes across all facility providers and did not include adjustment for factors such as whether the provider was a part-time employee. VISN and facility leadership acknowledged that no data validation steps were taken prior to submitting VISN Response 2 to Congressman Walz. We found that most primary care providers had panel sizes outside the Veterans Health Administration expected panel sizes range, which affects the timeliness of patients seeing a provider. Staff reported that patients are redirected to urgent care when a primary care provider is not available to see them on the same day. We found that facility staff distributed a news release with data reporting similar errors to those found in VISN 23 Response 2 related to reported primary care average panel sizes for physicians and mid-level providers. We also reviewed the accuracy of data provided in a response from the VISN to the OIG Hotline Case at issue. We found that the facility-reported average panel size for November 2013 was generally accurate compared to the historical facility Primary Care Management Module data for November 2013. We made one recommendation.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Acting Veterans Integrated Service Network Director ensure that the Facility Director reviews Primary Care Management Module data and reports and takes steps to follow Veterans Health Administration guidance for primary care provider panel sizes across the system.