Citation Nr: 0712998 Decision Date: 05/02/07 Archive Date: 05/15/07 DOCKET NO. 05-22 305 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in No. Little Rock, Arkansas THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for glaucoma, secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus. 2. Entitlement to service connection for seborrheic dermatitis (dermatitis), secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Veteran ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Sarah E. Abraham, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active military service from March 1966 to March 1968, including service in the Republic of Vietnam. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal of a June 2004 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in No. Little Rock, Arkansas, which denied service connection for glaucoma and dermatitis, both as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The veteran is service-connected for diabetes mellitus, type II, rated as 20 percent disabling, from May 8, 2001. 2. There is a balance of evidence on the question of whether the veteran's current glaucoma is due to his service- connected diabetes. 3. There is a balance of evidence on the question of whether the veteran's current dermatitis is due to his service- connected diabetes. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Resolving doubt in the veteran's favor, the veteran's glaucoma is proximately due to or the result of the veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, 1110, 1137 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.307, 3.309, 3.310(a), 4.84a (2006) 2. Resolving doubt in the veteran's favor, the veteran's dermatitis is proximately due to or the result of the veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, 1110, 1137 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303, 3.307, 3.309, 3.310(a), 4.118 (2006) REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS In this decision, the Board grants service connection for glaucoma and dermatitis. This represents a complete grant of the benefits sought on appeal. See Barrera v. Gober, 122 F.3d 1030 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Thus, no discussion of VA's duties to notify and assist is required. Service connection may be granted for a disability resulting from disease or injury incurred or aggravated during active service. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110; 38 C.F.R. § 3.303. The law also provides that service connection may be granted for any disease diagnosed after discharge when all the evidence, including that pertinent to service, establishes that the disease was incurred in service. 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(d). In determining whether service connection is warranted for a disability, VA is responsible for determining whether the evidence supports the claim or is in relative equipoise, with the veteran prevailing in either event, or whether a preponderance of the evidence is against the claim, in which case the claim is denied. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107; Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990). Secondary service connection may be granted for a disability which is proximately due to or the result of a service- connected disorder. 38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a). Secondary service connection may be found in certain instances in which a service-connected disability aggravates another condition. When aggravation of a veteran's non-service-connected condition is proximately due to or the result of a service- connected condition, the veteran shall be compensated for the degree of disability (but only that degree) over and above the degree of disability existing prior to the aggravation. Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995). Effective October 10, 2006, 38 C.F.R. § 3.310 was amended to codify the Court's holding in Allen, which relates to secondary service connection on the basis of the aggravation of a nonservice-connected disorder by service-connected disability. See 71 Fed. Reg. 52744 (2006). The amendment essentially requires that a baseline level of severity of the nonservice-connected disease or injury must be established by medical evidence created before the onset of aggravation. In determining whether service connection is warranted for a disability, VA is responsible for determining whether the evidence supports the claim or is in relative equipoise, with the veteran prevailing in either event, or whether a preponderance of the evidence is against the claim, in which case the claim is denied. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107; Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990). I. Glaucoma The veteran's private medical records from a doctor of optometry consistently show notations of his diabetic status in conjunction with glaucoma. In February 2005, the veteran underwent a VA ophthalmology examination. The physician diagnosed glaucoma and stated that diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for glaucoma, but does not cause glaucoma. The Board finds that the evidence is in relative equipoise; thus, it is sufficient to establish service connection for glaucoma. II. Dermatitis Post-service medical records reflect that he has been treated for his skin condition. An August 2002 VA examination report shows the veteran as being diagnosed with dermatitis. The examiner noted that this condition is more common in people who have diabetes. The veteran was afforded another VA examination in February 2005. This physician not only diagnosed dermatitis, but also stated that it was likely aggravated by the service-connected diabetes. He reasoned that it was most likely that the dermatitis represented an infection of a yeast in the hair follicles; therefore, infections in an immuno-suppressed diabetic patient, like this veteran, are more likely to evolve and become chronic. The Board finds that the evidence of record supports the veteran's claim; thus, service connection for dermatitis is warranted. ORDER Service connection for glaucoma, secondary to diabetes mellitus, is granted. Service connection for dermatitis, secondary to diabetes mellitus, is granted. ____________________________________________ MICHAEL E. KILCOYNE Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs