Breadcrumb

Healthcare Inspection – Quality of Care Concerns of a Surgical Patient, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, Arkansas

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
15-04516-229
VISN
State
Arkansas
District
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Report Author
Office of Healthcare Inspections
Report Type
Hotline Healthcare Inspection
Recommendations
3
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
OIG conducted an inspection to assess allegations about a surgical patient’s care at the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (system), John L. McClellan Memorial Veterans Hospital, Little Rock, AR. We did not substantiate that physicians failed to examine the patient every day; electronic health record (EHR) documentation contained daily assessments. We did not substantiate that the patient was in bilateral wrist restraints continuously for over 30 days or that nursing staff did not follow physician orders regarding the patient’s activity level. EHR documentation showed restraints were used but removed periodically and nurses increased the patient’s activity level when ordered to do so. We found the system’s restraint policy did not require notification of system leaders of duration of medical restraint use. We did not substantiate that the use of restraints caused a full thickness tissue loss or that staff failed to address an issue with the patient’s foot and ankle. However, staff did not consistently follow the system’s policy regarding wound care documentation. We substantiated that a request for a transfer was denied but we did not substantiate that the denial was inappropriate. Services the patient needed were not available at the second hospital. We could not substantiate that nursing staff were making bets on how much medication they could give another patient to keep him quiet. The patient had a history of alcohol use but the EHR did not contain documentation that the surgical team offered preoperative detoxification; it is unknown, however, if the patient would have agreed to the offer. We made three recommendations: (1) ensure a peer review is conducted to determine if the risk of alcohol was adequately assessed and whether inpatient management was reasonable, (2) modify the restraint policy to include leadership notification of patients in medical restraints after specified timeframes, and (3) ensure wound care documentation is consistent with system policy.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the System Director ensure a peer review is conducted of this case to determine whether the risk of alcohol withdrawal was adequately assessed prior to the patient’s aortofemoral bypass graft surgery in 2015 and whether this patient’s inpatient medical management, including the complications presented by the patient’s prolonged alcohol withdrawal, was reasonable.
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the System Director modify the system’s restraint policy to include leadership notification of patients in medical restraints after a specified timeframe in restraints.
No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the System Director ensure wound care documentation is consistent with system policy and monitor compliance.