Breadcrumb

Audit of Veteran Wait Time Data, Choice Access, and Consult Management in VISN 15

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
17-00481-117
VISN
State
Illinois
Kansas
Missouri
District
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Report Author
Office of Audits and Evaluations
Report Type
Audit
Recommendations
11
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) assessed the reliability of wait time data and evaluated whether Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 15 provided timely access to health care within its medical facilities and through Choice, and whether they appropriately managed consults. The OIG estimated that new patients waited an average of about 18 days, and 18 percent of the appointments for new patients at VISN 15 facilities had wait times longer than 30 days. This was higher than the estimated 10 percent that Veterans Health Administration’s (VHA) electronic scheduling system showed. Staff did not correctly record clinically indicated dates for about 38 percent of the new patient appointments, which understated wait times by about 15 days. Inaccurate wait time data resulted in veterans not being identified as eligible for Choice. With respect to veterans in VISN 15 who received care through Choice, the OIG estimated that the overall average wait time was 32 days. The audit estimated that 41 percent of the appointments had wait times longer than 30 days, and those veterans waited an average of 58 days. Facilities did not have adequate procedures to monitor the aging of veteran referrals from facilities to TriWest, and did not consistently monitor the aging of the authorized Choice care. Regarding consults, facility staff discontinued or canceled an estimated 27 percent inappropriately, which led to veterans experiencing additional delays, or not receiving the requested care. Clinicians and staff were still unclear on specific consult management procedures. The Office of Healthcare Inspections identified clinical concerns with six patients, and determined that one patient likely had an adverse outcome as a result of a delay of care. The OIG made 11 recommendations—three to the Office of the Under Secretary for Health and eight to the VISN 15 Director. VHA and VISN 15 provided responsive action plans.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Integrated Service Network 15 Director ensure that staff at all network facilities use the clinically indicated date, when available, when scheduling new patient appointments.
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Health Administration Executive in Charge initiate a process to automate the use of the clinically indicated date, when applicable, when scheduling appointments.
No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Integrated Service Network 15 Director ensure network facilities appropriately manage the scheduler audit tool in order to conduct the required scheduler audits, communicate specific audit results to scheduling staff, and take corrective actions as needed based on audit results.
No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Integrated Service Network 15 Director examine processes to improve monitoring and tracking for timely surveillance colonoscopies.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Integrated Service Network 15 Director implement additional standard monitoring procedures sufficient to enable network facility staff to accurately manage the aging of all referrals for eligible veterans for Choice care.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Health Administration Executive in Charge implement standard monitoring procedures to ensure medical appointment timeliness standards are met as required under Choice contracts.
No. 7
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Health Administration Executive in Charge implement controls to ensure Choice medical documentation is received timely in accordance with Choice contracts.
No. 8
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Integrated Service Network 15 Director communicate specific audit results of VHA’s audit of consults to all network facility staff involved in consult management, implement specific training, and ensure corrective action is taken as needed.
No. 9
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Integrated Service Network 15 Director ensure network facilities manage consults that are clinically indicated for the future in accordance with VHA’s consult policy.
No. 10
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Integrated Service Network 15 Director ensure network facilities implement contingency plans in accordance with VHA’s outpatient clinic practice management policy and communicate to providers regarding how to process consults when a service becomes unavailable.
No. 11
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The OIG recommended the Veterans Integrated Service Network 15 Director ensure the care of patients identified in the patient summaries of this report are evaluated, take action, if appropriate, and confer with Regional Counsel regarding the appropriateness of disclosures to patients and families.