Breadcrumb

VA’s Administration of the Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation Contract

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
17-04178-46
VA Office
Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
Report Author
Office of Audits and Evaluations
Report Type
Audit
Recommendations
7
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
Between March and August 2016, VA’s Technology Acquisition Center (TAC) awarded the Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation multiple award contract to 28 contractors for information technology services. The contract has a total maximum value of $22.3 billion. The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted this audit to determine whether task orders issued under the contract were administered according to federal and VA acquisition regulations, as well as VA national and local policies and procedures. The OIG also examined whether the TAC performed task order award and modification procedures according to applicable regulations and policy and took actions that reasonably ensured contractors could successfully complete contract requirements. While the OIG identified no violations of federal and VA acquisition regulations, the audit team found oversight weaknesses that, if not corrected, could increase the likelihood of VA conducting business with contractors unable to provide services according to contract requirements. These weaknesses place information technology systems and hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars at unnecessary risk and potentially harm VA’s ability to fulfill its mission to care for veterans. The OIG made recommendations to address identified deficiencies with improved procedures that program office contracting officer’s representatives and TAC contracting officers should perform. These include determining the method and level of detail required for contracting officer’s representatives to document their review of the acceptability of deliverables and procedures that will provide contracting officers the assurance this review was adequately completed. The OIG also recommended timeliness requirements for submitting performance assessments. Finally, the OIG recommended implementing procedures to monitor contracting officers’ actions through compliance reviews; assessing the risk related to removing certain past performance assessments from procedures; and defining actions to take when higher-risk financial stability risk scores are identified.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
The Technology Acquisition Center associate executive director provide written requirements, in designation memoranda or other written medium, that identify the method and level of detail required for program office contracting officers’ representatives to adequately document their review of contractor deliverables and determination of acceptability.
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
The Technology Acquisition Center associate executive director develop procedures for Technology Acquisition Center contracting officers to ensure review and acceptability of contractor deliverables is adequately documented in contract files to help prevent improper payments.
No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
The Technology Acquisition Center associate executive director develop timeliness requirements for program office contracting officers’ representatives to submit contractor performance assessments.
No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
The Technology Acquisition Center associate executive director develop written follow-up procedures that standardize the actions Technology Acquisition Center contracting officers should take when program office contracting officers’ representatives do not comply with the developed timeliness requirements.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
The Technology Acquisition Center associate executive director implement procedures to monitor Technology Acquisition Center contracting officers’ actions through compliance reviews to ensure they adhere to written procedures.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
The Technology Acquisition Center associate executive director assess the risk introduced by removing the requirement to review Past Performance Information Retrieval System records and implements a control that mitigates this risk.
No. 7
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Acquisitions, Logistics, and Construction (OALC)
The Technology Acquisition Center associate executive director enhance written procedures by providing Technology Acquisition Center contracting officers with standards that define higher-risk financial stability risk scores and subsequent actions that should be taken when these scores are identified.
Total Monetary Impact of All Recommendations
Open: $ 0.00
Closed: $ 37,500,000.00