Breadcrumb

Audiology Leaders’ Deficiencies Responding to Poor Care and Monitoring Performance at the Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System in Muskogee

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
20-04341-182
VISN
19
State
Oklahoma
District
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Report Author
Office of Healthcare Inspections
Report Type
Hotline Healthcare Inspection
Report Topic
Patient Safety
Major Management Challenges
Healthcare Services
Leadership and Governance
Recommendations
10
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
The OIG conducted this healthcare inspection after receiving information from the facility that an audiologist had provided poor care and billed for unrendered services. The inspection focused on actions the Audiology Supervisor, Service Chief, and Chief of Staff (audiology leaders) took in response to the audiologist’s poor clinical care. A facility fact-finding review revealed the audiologist provided poor care to eight of 43 patients reviewed, including misinforming patients who needed hearing aids that hearing aids were not needed. Although the audiology leaders reported the fact-finding results to the OIG, they failed to evaluate whether patients needed clinical follow-up; determine whether additional patients were affected by the audiologist’s poor care; evaluate whether clinical disclosures were required for the affected patients; and communicate the fact-finding results to the Facility Director, who was therefore unable to initiate the process to determine the necessity of a large scale disclosure. The instances of poor care were also not reported to the Patient Safety Manager who was, as a result, unable to assess the adverse events to determine if patient safety interventions were indicated. The OIG also found that performance monitoring of facility audiologists was not conducted as required. Annual competency assessments and annual performance appraisals were not consistently completed and did not contain adequate performance standards. Audiology leaders failed to consider whether the audiologist’s actions warranted a report to the state licensing board due to a lack of understanding of the requirements for reporting and, therefore, the Facility Director was not informed of the need to initiate a state licensing board review. The OIG made 10 recommendations to the Facility Director related to ensuring patients affected by poor audiology care receive follow-up and disclosures as appropriate, overseeing audiologists, and ensuring audiology leaders’ compliance with policies regarding disclosure, adverse event reporting, and state licensing board reporting.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System Director confirms the Chief of Staff, the Service Chief, and the Supervisory Audiologist have processes in place to ensure patients affected by the audiologist’s poor care are identified and receive clinically-indicated follow-up.
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System Director evaluates processes, including annual competencies, used to ensure audiology leaders’ compliance with the Veterans Health Administration’s adverse event disclosure requirements, and takes action as indicated.
No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System Director requires the Chief of Staff, the Service Chief, and the Supervisory Audiologist to complete clinical disclosures, as appropriate, for patients identified as being affected by the audiologist’s poor care.
No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System Director initiates the process to determine whether a large scale disclosure is required, in accordance with the Veterans Health Administration policy.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System Director evaluates processes, including annual competencies, used to ensure audiology leaders’ compliance with the Veterans Health Administration’s patient safety reporting requirements, and takes action as indicated.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System Director directs the Chief of Staff, the Service Chief, and the Supervisory Audiologist to notify the Patient Safety Manager of adverse events identified through the review of patients impacted by the audiologist’s poor care.
No. 7
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System Director ensures the Supervisory Audiologist verifies and documents annual competency assessments for audiologists in compliance with facility policy.
No. 8
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System Director ensures that the Supervisory Audiologist conducts performance appraisals of audiologists in compliance with the Veterans Health Administration policy.
No. 9
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System Director evaluates processes, including annual competencies, used to ensure audiology leaders’ compliance with Veterans Health Administration’s state licensing board reporting policy, and takes action as indicated.
No. 10
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Eastern Oklahoma VA Health Care System Director initiates a review of the audiologist’s conduct to determine whether a report to the state licensing board is indicated, in accordance with the Veterans Health Administration policy.