Breadcrumb

Audit of VA’s Compliance under the DATA Act of 2014

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
20-04237-09
VISN
State
District
VA Office
Office of Management (OM)
Report Author
Office of Audits and Evaluations
Report Type
Audit
Report Topic
Financial Management
Major Management Challenges
Stewardship of Taxpayer Dollars
Recommendations
12
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
The VA OIG contracted with the independent public accounting firm CliftonLarsonAllen LLP (CLA) to audit VA’s compliance under the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014 (DATA Act). CLA conducted this performance audit with data sampled from the fourth quarter of fiscal year (FY) 2020, in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards. CLA primarily conducted its audit work during FY 2021, and the results of the audit are presented in the attached report. The VA OIG does not express an opinion on VA’s compliance under the DATA Act.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Office of Management (OM)

Continue the system modernization efforts that provide VA with the capability to generate the required DATA Act reporting files containing the necessary elements to meet compliance with the DATA Act. Ensure the modernization will provide the following:

a. Accurate reporting of object class, program activity codes, program activity names, and all other elements required by the DATA Act.

b. Award identification to allow VA to be able to develop a File C and reconcile the File C to both summary level data (Files A and B) and award level data (File D).

c. Reconciliations with subsidiary systems.

d. A mechanism to ensure transactions are reported that currently may be excluded due to the use of 1358s.

e. Standardized data fields to allow management to record an award ID across financial and supporting systems.

f. Subsidiary systems that are consistent with USSGL or adequately mapped to USSGL to ensure transactions contain the necessary data elements/field required to meet DATA Act reporting.

g. Differentiation between direct and reimbursable amounts.

No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
Implement a grants management solution across all of VA’s grant programs and develop processes to ensure integration with the new reporting system.
No. 3
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Office of Management (OM)
Improve researching of all root causes of differences between the VBA source systems and the monthly GTAS balances as part of their File B reconciliations. Also, differences should be accumulated and assessed at an aggregate level. The total differences either allocated to programs, reclassified out of other programs, or attributed to MinX JVs should be researched and reported as part of the SAO sub-certification process.
No. 4
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Office of Management (OM)
Continue mapping efforts and ensure programs without entitlement codes are recorded with the correct program activity codes and names rather than defaulting to Compensation.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
Work with component level SAO’s to ensure timely receipt of signed certifications.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
Include more information in the SAO certifications, the Data Quality Plan document and the data submission about the costing and aggregation methodologies VA uses to report VHA data to increase transparency.
No. 7
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
Implement internal controls and update policies and procedures to improve the accuracy of and completeness of the information submitted for DATA Act reporting. The internal controls should ensure the following: a. Excluded payments not reported due to zip code issues are researched, cleared, and reported in VBA’s life insurance FABS submission. b. The default code “90” for Congressional District is not used when the county or zip code are unknown; instead, perform research to obtain the required data. c. Guidance from OMB and Treasury is requested on the proper reporting of the face amount of insurance policies in VBA’s FABS submissions. d. Management’s policies and procedures (e.g., Standard Operating Procedures) and narratives are updated on a timely basis in coordination with the VA PMO for the most current DATA Act submission procedures and reporting requirements.
No. 8
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
Ensure that reconciliations are complete, reconciling items are identified and researched, and any resolutions are clearly documented.
No. 9
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Office of Management (OM)
Investigate potential controls or processes that could identify 1358s that should be reported until the system modernization can implement a solution.
No. 10
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
Implement internal controls and update policies and procedures to improve the accuracy of and completeness of the information submitted for FABS reporting. The update should include and adhere to all FABS and DAIMS reporting requirements.
No. 11
Open Recommendation Image, Square
to Office of Management (OM)
Improve reviewing and validating eCMS actions to underlying contract documentation to assess the completeness and accuracy of data stored in eCMS. Identified exceptions should continue to be documented, and appropriate corrective actions (e.g., adequate training and guidance) should be completed to ensure and improve completeness and accuracy of data stored in eCMS.
No. 12
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Office of Management (OM)
Coordinate and report system errors to Treasury on an as needed basis to ensure all required or derivable data elements are reported for FABS submission.