Citation Nr: 0810505 Decision Date: 03/28/08 Archive Date: 04/09/08 DOCKET NO. 07-34 656A ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St. Louis, Missouri THE ISSUE Entitlement to Vocational Rehabilitation benefits under Title 38, Chapter 31, United States Code. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD C. M. Powell, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service from September 1954 to July 1956. This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a March 2007 determination of the St. Louis Regional Office (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The appeal is REMANDED to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC), in Washington, DC. VA will notify the appellant if further action is required. REMAND The veteran's November 2007 VA Form 9 reflects that he requested a Board hearing at a local VA Regional Office. However, the evidence of record does not demonstrate that the RO has scheduled the veteran for such hearing. Thus, because a hearing has not been conducted and the request has not been withdrawn, the appeal is remanded to ensure compliance with due process requirements. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: The RO should contact the veteran and inquire if he wants a Travel Board hearing or a videoconference hearing at the local RO before a Veterans Law Judge of the Board of Veterans' Appeals. Thereafter, the veteran should be scheduled, at the local RO, for the type of personal hearing that he has so indicated. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). _________________________________________________ U. R. POWELL Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 2002), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2007).