Citation Nr: 0810575 Decision Date: 03/31/08 Archive Date: 04/09/08 DOCKET NO. 03-18 698 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Detroit, Michigan THE ISSUE Entitlement to a rating in excess of 10 percent for a left knee disability. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: The American Legion WITNESSES AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant and spouse ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD S. Higgs, Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty from October 1986 to October 1994. This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a rating decision dated in October 2002 by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Detroit, Michigan. This case was the subject of a March 2005 hearing before an acting Veterans Law Judge no longer at the Board, and of a Board remand dated in August 2005. The appeal is REMANDED to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC), in Washington, DC. VA will notify the appellant if further action is required. REMAND The veteran provided testimony at a hearing before the Board in March 2005. The law requires that the Veterans Law Judge that conducted a hearing on an appeal must participate in any decision made on that appeal. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7107(c) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.707. In February 2008, the veteran was informed that the acting Veterans Law Judge who conducted the March 2005 hearing would not be able to render a decision on the matter on appeal, and was afforded the opportunity for a hearing before a Veterans Law Judge currently at the Board. In a reply received in February 2008, the veteran elected to have a new hearing before a Veterans Law Judge of the Board at his local Regional Office. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: The RO should schedule the veteran for a hearing at the local RO before a Veterans Law Judge of the Board on the issue of entitlement to a rating in excess of 10 percent for a left knee disability. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals or by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West Supp. 2007). _________________________________________________ U. R. POWELL Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 2002), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2007).