Citation Nr: 0812287 Decision Date: 04/14/08 Archive Date: 05/01/08 DOCKET NO. 06-10 576 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in San Juan, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for the cause of the veteran's death. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: The American Legion ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD D. Vella Camilleri, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty from October 1969 to August 1971. He died in September 2004. The appellant is his surviving spouse. This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an August 2005 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in San Juan, Puerto Rico, which denied the claim. The appeal is REMANDED to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC), in Washington, DC. VA will notify the appellant if further action is required. REMAND Review of the appellant's claim at this time would be premature. The appellant submitted a VA Form 9 in March 2006 and requested a hearing at the local VA office before a member of the Board. In an April 2006 letter, the RO informed her that it would be unable to include her on the docket of hearings to be conducted by the Board in May 2006. The RO requested the appellant to provide notice should she no longer wish to have a hearing before a member of the traveling section of the Board, and further indicated that she would retain her place on the hearing docket unless the RO heard otherwise. The appellant responded to the April 2006 letter in a May 2006 VA Form 21-4138. The RO interpreted her statement as a desire to cancel the requested hearing. There is no indication in this statement, however, that the appellant no longer wished to appear for a hearing before a traveling member of the Board. Therefore, to ensure full compliance with due process requirements, a remand is required to schedule the appellant for a Board hearing. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: Schedule the appellant for a hearing at the RO before a Veterans Law Judge, in accordance with applicable law. A copy of the notice scheduling the hearing should be placed in the claims folder. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board or by the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West Supp. 2007). _________________________________________________ P.M. DILORENZO Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 2002), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2007).