Citation Nr: 0814174 Decision Date: 04/30/08 Archive Date: 05/08/08 DOCKET NO. 05-35 559A ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Chicago, Illinois THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). 2. Entitlement to service connection for headaches, to include as secondary to PTSD. 3. Entitlement to service connection for seizures, to include as secondary to PTSD. 4. Entitlement to service connection for hypertension (HTN), to include as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, Type II (DM). REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD K.A. Kennerly, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty from December 1967 to July 1970. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from rating decisions in June 2004 and February 2006 of the Chicago, Illinois, Regional Office (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The issues of entitlement to service connection for PTSD; headaches, to include as secondary to PTSD; seizures, to include as secondary to PTSD; and HTN, to include as secondary to service-connected DM, are REMANDED to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC), in Washington, DC. The veteran will be informed if any further action on his part is required. REMAND After a thorough review of the veteran's claims file, the Board has determined that additional development must be performed prior to the adjudication of the veteran's claims. In a report of contact, dated February 14, 2008, the veteran indicated that he wished to be scheduled for a Board video conference hearing. As such, these issues are remanded to the RO so this may be accomplished. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: The issues of entitlement to service connection for: PTSD; headaches, to include as secondary to PTSD; seizures, to include as secondary to PTSD; and hypertension, to include as secondary to DM, are remanded to the AMC/RO to schedule the veteran for a video conference hearing before a member of the Board. After the hearing has been held, or the veteran cancels the hearing or fails to report, the case should be returned directly to the Board for further consideration. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter or matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals or by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West Supp. 2007). ______________________________________________ BARBARA B. COPELAND Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs