Citation Nr: 0814866 Decision Date: 05/06/08 Archive Date: 05/12/08 DOCKET NO. 03-35 627 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Phoenix, Arizona THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for pes planus. 2. Entitlement to service connection for sleep apnea. 3. Entitlement to service connection for left arm disability. 4. Whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, to include major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. 5. Entitlement to an increased rating for degenerative changes, lumbar spine, currently rated 20 percent disabling. 6. Entitlement to an increased rating for residuals coccyx trauma with coccydynia, currently rated 10 percent disabling. 7. Entitlement to a compensable rating for urinary condition. 8. Entitlement to a total disability rating based upon individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities (TDIU). REPRESENTATION Veteran represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD M.W. Kreindler, Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active service from November 1961 to November 1964, and from May 1976 to January 1977. This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) from rating decisions of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). FINDING OF FACT The veteran died in January 2008. CONCLUSION OF LAW Because of the death of the veteran, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2007). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION Unfortunately, the veteran died during the pendency of the appeal. As a matter of law, veterans' claims do not survive their deaths. Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the veteran and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2007). In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the veteran. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1106 (2007). ORDER The appeal is dismissed. ____________________________________________ ALAN S. PEEVY Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs