Citation Nr: 1001995 Decision Date: 01/12/10 Archive Date: 01/22/10 DOCKET NO. 05-29 173 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Albuquerque, New Mexico THE ISSUE Entitlement to a rating in excess of 10 percent for tendonitis of the right shoulder. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Veteran ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Patrick Alberts, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran had active service from April 1992 to March 2003. She was activated to active service in February 2007 and returned from Iraq in January 2008. The appeal is REMANDED to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC), in Washington, DC. VA will notify the appellant if further action is required. REMAND The Veteran has appealed the denial of service connection for tendonitis of the right shoulder. The Board remanded this matter for VA examination and the collection of service treatment records (STRs) in March 2008. Review of the file shows that the examination was scheduled, but it was noted that the examination was cancelled because the Veteran withdrew her claim. There is no evidence in the file, however, that the Veteran requested that her claim be withdrawn. Indeed, the Veteran's representative presented argument in December 2009 as if the veteran was still pursuing her appeal. An appeal may be withdrawn by the Veteran or by her authorized representative in a writing addressed to the Board. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. The Board must remand this matter to seek clarification from the Veteran as to whether she wishes to withdraw her claim for entitlement to service connection for tendonitis of the right shoulder. If she does not wish to withdraw that claim, the RO must afford her the VA examination ordered in the March 2008 Board remand. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: 1. Obtain clarification from the Veteran as to whether she wishes to withdraw her claim for entitlement to service connection for tendonitis of the right shoulder. 2. If the Veteran does not wish to withdraw the claim, then proceed with development as ordered in the March 2008 Board remand. The March 2008 Board remand requested that all outstanding service medical records from the Veteran's most recent period of active service be obtained. Then, the Veteran should be scheduled a VA examination with the appropriate specialist to determine the current severity of the Veteran's right shoulder disability. The Veteran's claims folder should be made available to the examiner. The examiner should perform all necessary clinical testing and render all appropriate diagnoses based upon the reported symptomatology. The range of motion study should include comments on functional loss due to pain, fatigability, lack of endurance and incoordination. Appropriate testing should be performed to specifically identify any associated objective symptoms of the claimed conditions. The examiner should also discuss the relationship between her shoulder disability and the condition of her sternum and chest-claimed to be due to the same in-service injury. 3. If the benefits sought on appeal remain denied, the Veteran and her accredited representative should be issued a supplemental statement of the case (SSOC) and given a reasonable opportunity to respond. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter or matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals or by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West Supp. 2009). _________________________________________________ JAMES L. MARCH Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 2002 & Supp. 2009), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2009).