Citation Nr: 1006941 Decision Date: 02/25/10 Archive Date: 03/05/10 DOCKET NO. 06-24 777A ) DATE ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Waco, Texas THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an evaluation higher than 40 percent for the Veteran's service-connected low back disorder with limitation of motion and traumatic arthritis of the lumbar spine. 2. Entitlement to an evaluation higher than 30 percent for the Veteran's service-connected residuals of a cervical spine injury with limitation of motion and traumatic arthritis. REPRESENTATION Veteran represented by: Texas Veterans Commission ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD C. Ferguson, Counsel INTRODUCTION This matter arises before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a September 2005 rating decision by the above Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Veteran in this case served on active duty from April 1974 to April 1994. 2. On January 26, 2010, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2009). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 2002). An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2009). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. In the present case, the Veteran's representative sent to the Board by facsimile a letter written by the Veteran dated January 26, 2010, wherein he requested to have his appeal regarding the matters involving an increased rating for his service-connected lumbar and cervical spine disabilities withdrawn. Because the Veteran has withdrawn this appeal, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. ANDREW J. MULLEN Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs