Citation Nr: 1010629 Decision Date: 03/19/10 Archive Date: 03/31/10 DOCKET NO. 08-06 578 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St. Paul, Minnesota THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or emphysema, to include as secondary to service-connected asbestosis. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Elizabeth Jalley, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from December 1963 to November 1967. This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a May 2007 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in St. Paul, Minnesota. In May 2009, the Veteran submitted a substantive appeal form requesting a Board hearing at his local RO before a Member of the Board. His case was remanded by the Board in November 2009 to accommodate this request. A January 2010 report of contact reflects that the Veteran agreed to attend a March 17, 2010, videoconference in lieu of a Travel Board hearing. The Veteran was sent appropriate notice to confirm that his hearing had been scheduled. As will be discussed below, a March 2010 letter from the Veteran's representative withdrew the Veteran's claim. A hearing is therefore no longer considered necessary, and the request is deemed to have been withdrawn. FINDING OF FACT On March 17, 2010, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran, or his authorized representative, have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2009). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 2002). An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2009). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. In the present case, the Veteran, through his authorized representative, has withdrawn this appeal and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. ____________________________________________ MICHAEL LANE Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs