Citation Nr: 1033063 Decision Date: 09/02/10 Archive Date: 09/13/10 DOCKET NO. 08-01 747 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Waco, Texas THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased evaluation for status post right shoulder arthroplasty with degenerative joint disease, currently rated as 60 percent disabling. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Texas Veterans Commission WITNESSES AT HEARING ON APPEAL Veteran, Wife, Brother and Son ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD J. N. Moats, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran had active duty service from April 1959 to May 1962 and from July 1962 to October 1967. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a June 2007 rating decision by a Regional Office (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). A notice of disagreement was received in July 2007, a statement of the case was issued in November 2007, and a substantive appeal was received in January 2008. A Board hearing at the local RO was held in June 2010. FINDING OF FACT In a June 2010 statement, the Veteran indicated that he no longer wished to pursue an appeal on the issue of entitlement to an increased rating for status post right shoulder arthroplasty with degenerative joint disease. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of a substantive appeal by the Veteran, as it relates to entitlement to an increased rating for status post right shoulder arthroplasty with degenerative joint disease, have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 20.202, 20.204 (2009). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105, the Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. A substantive appeal may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.202. Withdrawal may be made by the veteran or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. In light of a June 2010 rating decision, which granted a permanent and total rating, in a June 2010 statement, the Veteran withdrew his appeal as to the issue of entitlement to an increased rating for status post right shoulder arthroplasty with degenerative joint disease as this rating decision was considered a full grant of the benefit sought on appeal. Hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration of that issue. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal of that issue and it is dismissed without prejudice. ORDER The appeal as to the issue of entitlement to an increased rating for status post right shoulder arthroplasty with degenerative joint disease is dismissed. ____________________________________________ WILLIAM H. DONNELLY Acting Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs