Citation Nr: 1104591 Decision Date: 02/04/11 Archive Date: 02/14/11 DOCKET NO. 09-07 681 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Muskogee, Oklahoma THE ISSUE Entitlement to the full-time monthly rate under 38 U.S.C.A. Chapter 30 (Montgomery GI Bill) for the spring 2008 semester. ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD J. W. Kim, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran had active service from February 2001 to April 2005. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a decision of the Muskogee, Oklahoma, Regional Office (RO) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Given the Veteran's contention that he is entitled to the full- time rate for his spring 2008 semester, the Board has recharacterized the issue as stated on the title page of this decision. The appeal is REMANDED to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC), in Washington, DC. VA will notify the Veteran if further action is required. REMAND The crux of this matter is whether the Veteran was enrolled in 12 credit hours of approved courses during the spring 2008 semester. The Board observes that 12 semester hours is considered full-time at the Veteran's college. The Veteran has raised the question of whether a particular course, "Speedy Spanish I," was necessary to enable him to pursue his program of education. In a July 2008 letter to his senator, the Veteran stated that he was required to take a one- credit Spanish course on medical terminology as a condition of his acceptance into the nursing program. However, the record indicates that such course is not being counted as an approved course. Thus, the RO should obtain an official report on whether this course was required for the Veteran's program of education. There is also a discrepancy in the number of credit hours assigned to another course, "Nursing Science I." A February 2008 class schedule reflects that it is worth 4 credits, but a May 2008 letter from the department chair indicates that it counts for 5 credits. Thus, the RO should obtain the official number of credit hours for this course. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following actions: 1. The RO should contact the Veteran's college to determine (a) whether enrollment in Speedy Spanish I was necessary to enable him to pursue his nursing program and (b) the number of credit hours assigned to Nursing Science I. 2. Thereafter, the RO should readjudicate the claim. If the benefit sought on appeal remains denied, the Veteran should be provided a supplemental statement of the case and given an opportunity to respond. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter or matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals or by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West Supp. 2009). _________________________________________________ ERIC S. LEBOFF Acting Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 2002), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2010).