Citation Nr: 1132913 Decision Date: 09/07/11 Archive Date: 09/15/11 DOCKET NO. 08-10 050 ) DATE ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office and Insurance Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania THE ISSUE Entitlement to an apportionment of the Veteran's compensation benefits on behalf of LMF. ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD A. P. Simpson, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from July 1974 to May 1977. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a June 2007 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office & Insurance Center (RO) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, wherein the RO denied the appellant apportionment benefits. The appellant is the Veteran's former spouse, and she filed a claim seeking an apportionment of the Veteran's compensation benefits on behalf of their daughter, LMF. FINDING OF FACT On August 3, 2011, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the appellant that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the appellant have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2010). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 2002). An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2010). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. In the present case, the appellant has withdrawn this appeal. Specifically, on August 3, 2011, VA received a statement from the appellant, wherein she stated the Veteran had been current and accurate with payments made on behalf of their daughter and that she wanted to withdraw her appeal. Hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal, and it is dismissed. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. _____________________________________________ JESSICA J. WILLS Acting Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs