Citation Nr: 1133247 Decision Date: 09/08/11 Archive Date: 09/15/11 DOCKET NO. 08-32 292 ) DATE ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Muskogee, Oklahoma THE ISSUE Entitlement to an initial evaluation in excess of 30 percent for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD P. Olson, Counsel INTRODUCTION This matter comes back before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on Remand from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims regarding a Board decision rendered in June 2009. This matter was originally on appeal from an August 2007 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Regional Office (RO) in Muskogee, Oklahoma. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Veteran in this case served on active duty from December 1943 to January 1946. 2. On November 17, 2010, the Court of Appeals for Veteran's Claims (Court) was notified by the appellant's attorney that the appellant died in October 2010. By a May 2011 Memorandum Decision, the Board's June 2009 decision was vacated. CONCLUSION OF LAW Due to the death of the appellant, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this claim at this time. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2009); but see Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION Unfortunately, the appellant died during the pendency of the appeal. As a matter of law, appellants' claims do not survive their deaths. Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the appellant and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2010). In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the Veteran. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1106 (2010). The Board's dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion. Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the appellant's death. See Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008) (creating new 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, substitution in case of death of a claimant who dies on or after October 10, 2008). As provided for in this new provision, a person eligible for substitution will include "a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under section 5121(a) of this title ...." The Secretary will be issuing regulations governing the rules and procedures for substitution upon death. Until such regulations are issued, an eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the claimant should file a request for substitution with the VA regional office (RO) from which the claim originated (listed on the first page of this decision). ORDER The appeal is dismissed. MILO H. HAWLEY Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs