Citation Nr: 1319897 Decision Date: 06/20/13 Archive Date: 07/02/13 DOCKET NO. 09-49 418 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Waco, Texas THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for hypertension. 2. Entitlement to service connection for prostate cancer. 3. Entitlement to service connection for colon cancer. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD B. Berry, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from December 1973 to September 1975. These matters come to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a rating decision dated in April 2009 by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Waco, Texas. The appeal is REMANDED to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC), in Washington, DC. VA will notify the appellant if further action is required. REMAND After a review of the record, the Board has determined that further development is necessary before adjudication of the issues on appeal. The Veteran submitted a letter in November 2011 from the Social Security Administration (SSA) informing the Veteran that he is entitled to monthly disability benefits beginning in October 2001. The SSA disability determination and associated medical records are not in the claims file. Where VA has actual notice of the existence of records held by SSA, which appear relevant to a pending claim, VA has a duty to assist by requesting those records from SSA. See Murincsak v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 363, 369-70 (1992). The Veteran indicated in the November 2011 letter that he was awarded SSA disability benefits based on the same symptoms and complications he listed on his claim with VA. As the Board cannot say the SSA records are not relevant, a remand is necessary to obtain any SSA disability determination and medical records associated with the determination. See Golz v. Shinseki, 590 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (holding that the legal standard for relevance requires VA to examine the information it has related to medical records and if there exists a reasonable possibility that the records could help the Veteran substantiate his claim for benefits, the duty to assist requires VA to obtain the records). Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: 1. Contact the Social Security Administration (SSA) and request copies of any disability determinations and medical records used by that agency in making such determinations on behalf of the Veteran for SSA benefits purposes. Any records received should be associated with the Veteran's claims folder. If the search for such records has negative results, a statement to that effect should be placed in the Veteran's claims folder. 2. Upon completion of the foregoing, readjudicate the Veteran's claims, based on a review of the entire evidentiary record. If the benefits sought on appeal remains denied, provide the Veteran and his representative with a supplemental statement of the case and the opportunity to respond thereto. Thereafter, subject to current appellate procedure, the case should be returned to the Board for further consideration, if in order. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter or matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals or by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West Supp. 2012). _________________________________________________ MICHAEL MARTIN Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 2002), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2012).