Citation Nr: 1322894 Decision Date: 07/18/13 Archive Date: 07/24/13 DOCKET NO. 11-03 976 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Chicago, Illinois THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss. 2. Entitlement service connection for tinnitus. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Vietnam Veterans of America ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD L.M. Yasui, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran, who is the appellant in this case, served on active duty from January 1966 to December 1969. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a February 2009 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Chicago, Illinois. FINDING OF FACT In a written and signed statement received in July 2013, prior to the promulgation of a Board decision, the Veteran indicated that he no longer wished to pursue his appeal seeking service connection for bilateral hearing loss and service connection for tinnitus. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of a Substantive Appeal by the Veteran have been met as to the issues of service connection for bilateral hearing loss and service connection for tinnitus. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2002 & Supp. 2012); 38 C.F.R. §§ 20.202, 20.204 (2012). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION Withdrawal of Service Connection for Bilateral Hearing Loss and Tinnitus The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 2002). An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2012). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. In a written and signed statement received in July, 2013, the Veteran withdrew from consideration his claims of entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss and service connection for tinnitus. As the Veteran has withdrawn his appeal on those issues, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal, and it is dismissed without prejudice. ORDER The appeal of service connection for bilateral hearing loss is dismissed. The appeal of service connection for tinnitus is dismissed. ____________________________________________ K.J. ALIBRANDO Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs