Citation Nr: 1325766 Decision Date: 08/14/13 Archive Date: 08/16/13 DOCKET NO. 09-24 708 ) DATE ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Winston-Salem, North Carolina THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for immersion foot of the right foot. 2. Entitlement to an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for immersion foot of the left foot. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD K. Marenna, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran had active service from September 1982 to September 2002. These matters come before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a September 2008 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. This case was previously before the Board and remanded in November 2012. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Veteran in this case served on active duty from September 1982 to September 2002. 2. On July 22, 2013, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the appellant, through his authorized representative, that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the appellant have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2012). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 2002). An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2012). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. In the present case, the appellant, through his authorized representative, has withdrawn this appeal and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. MILO H. HAWLEY Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs