Citation Nr: 1328296 Decision Date: 09/05/13 Archive Date: 09/16/13 DOCKET NO. 10-03 815 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Jackson, Mississippi THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for residuals of a right knee injury. 2. Entitlement to service connection for a low back disorder. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD M. Carsten, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from September 1982 to August 1993, from June 1996 to March 1997, and from December 2001 to December 2002. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a June 2009 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Roanoke, Virginia. The appeal was certified to the Board by the RO in Jackson, Mississippi. The Virtual VA and VBMS folders have been reviewed. The appeal is REMANDED to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC), in Washington, DC. VA will notify the appellant if further action is required. REMAND In his January 2010 VA Form 9, the Veteran indicated that he did not want a Board hearing. In January 2013, the Veteran submitted another VA Form 9 and indicated that he wanted a videoconference hearing. On review, a remand is necessary so that the requested videoconference hearing may be scheduled. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: Schedule the Veteran for a videoconference hearing at the appropriate RO. Provide him and his representative reasonable advance notice of the date, time, and location of the hearing. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter or matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals or by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West Supp. 2012). _________________________________________________ H. N. SCHWARTZ Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 2002), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2012).