Citation Nr: 1328506 Decision Date: 09/06/13 Archive Date: 09/16/13 DOCKET NO. 12-12 389 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Roanoke, Virginia THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased rating for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), evaluated as 50 percent disabling prior to July 28, 2010 and 70 percent disabling thereafter. REPRESENTATION Veteran represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD T. Mainelli, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from January 1968 to December 1969. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a February 2010 rating decision issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Roanoke, Virginia, which increased the disability rating for PTSD to 50 percent. A January 2011 RO rating decision further increased the disability rating for PTSD to 70 percent, effective July 28, 2010. FINDING OF FACT On August 9, 2013, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that he wished to withdraw his appeal with respect to his claim for an increased rating for PTSD. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of appeal regarding the issue of entitlement to an increased rating for PTSD, evaluated as 50 percent disabling prior to July 28, 2010, and 70 percent disabling thereafter, have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2012). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 2002). An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2012). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. On August 9, 2013, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that he was withdrawing from appeal his claim for an increased rating for PTSD. As there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration, the Board has no jurisdiction to review the appeal. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. A. JAEGER Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs