Citation Nr: 1328676 Decision Date: 09/09/13 Archive Date: 09/17/13 DOCKET NO. 11-18 497 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Winston-Salem, North Carolina THE ISSUE Entitlement to restoration of VA pension benefits. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: The American Legion ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Christopher Murray, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran had active military service from February 1972 to February 1974. This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal of a September 2010 administrative decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), which terminated VA pension benefits due to excessive income. FINDING OF FACT In a July 2013 statement, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Veteran withdrew the appeal of the issue of entitlement to restoration of VA pension benefits. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of a Substantive Appeal have been met with respect to the issue of entitlement to restoration of VA pension benefits. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2012). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105, the Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. A Substantive Appeal may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.202 (2012). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2012). The appellant has withdrawn the issue of entitlement to restoration of VA pension benefits; hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review this issue and the appeal is dismissed. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. ____________________________________________ KELLI A. KORDICH Acting Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs