Citation Nr: 1329241 Decision Date: 09/12/13 Archive Date: 09/20/13 DOCKET NO. 12-02 806 ) DATE ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Reno, Nevada THE ISSUE Entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for fracture residuals of the 3rd and 4th digits of the right hand. REPRESENTATION Veteran represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL The Veteran's spouse ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD M. Donohue, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from November 1964 to November 1976, October 1983 to June 1984, and from February 1987 to June 1988. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal of a June 2011 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Reno, Nevada. The Veteran's spouse testified at a Travel Board hearing which was chaired by the undersigned Acting Veterans Law Judge at the Las Vegas, Nevada RO in May 2013. A transcript of the hearing has been associated with the Veteran's VA claims folder. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Veteran served on active duty from November 1964 to November 1976, October 1983 to June 1984, and from February 1987 to June 1988. 2. In August 2013 the Board was notified by the Social Security Administration that the Veteran died in June 2013. CONCLUSION OF LAW Due to the death of the Veteran, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this claim at this time. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2012); but see Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION Unfortunately, the Veteran died in June 2013, during the pendency of the appeal. As a matter of law, appellants' claims do not survive their deaths. Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). This appeal has become moot by virtue of the death of the Veteran and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2012). The Board's dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion. Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the appellant's death. See Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110- 389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008). An eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the claimant should file a request for substitution with the VA regional office (RO) from which the claim originated (listed on the first page of this decision). ORDER The appeal is dismissed. K. MILLIKAN Acting Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs