Citation Nr: 1329596 Decision Date: 09/16/13 Archive Date: 09/20/13 DOCKET NO. 07-23 886 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Muskogee, Oklahoma THE ISSUES 1. Whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). 2. Whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim of service connection for bilateral pes planus. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Tiffany Berry, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from January 1976 to November 1978. This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal of a March 2005 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Muskogee, Oklahoma. In January 2011, the Board remanded this claim for additional development. The appeal is again REMANDED to the RO. VA will notify the Veteran if further action is required. REMAND On his VA Form 9, the Veteran requested a hearing in this appeal before a member of the Board. The Veteran was initially scheduled for video conference hearing in October 2009. The Veteran failed, however, to appear for this hearing. In a statement received in August 2013, the Veteran stated that he was out of town and so he did not receive notice of his scheduled hearing before it had passed. As a result, he would like his video conference hearing to be rescheduled. Additionally, the Veteran indicated that he has moved to Wyoming, and requested that jurisdiction of his claims file be transferred to the Cheyenne, Wyoming RO. Therefore, the Board finds the Veteran has submitted good cause for his failure to appear at his previously scheduled hearing. As such, he should be rescheduled for his videoconference hearing. Prior to doing so, his claims file should be transferred to the Cheyenne, Wyoming RO. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: 1. Permanently transfer the Veteran's claims file to the RO in Cheyenne, Wyoming, as he has moved to Wyoming. 2. The RO in Cheyenne, Wyoming, should schedule the Veteran for a video conference hearing at the earliest opportunity. The Veteran and his representative should be notified of the date, time, and location of this hearing, and a copy of this notification letter should be placed in the claims file. Also, if, for whatever reason, the Veteran changes his mind and elects not to have this hearing, or fails to report for the proceeding on the date rescheduled, then also document this in the claims file. The Veteran has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). These claims must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board or by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West Supp. 2012). _________________________________________________ SARAMAE KREITLOW Acting Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 2002), only a decision of the Board is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2013).