Citation Nr: 1330855 Decision Date: 09/25/13 Archive Date: 09/30/13 DOCKET NO. 12-30 709A ) DATE ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Gainesville, Florida THE ISSUE Entitlement to reimbursement of medical expenses for treatment rendered at Citrus Memorial Hospital between January 15, 2012 and January 16, 2012. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: The American Legion ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Michael Wilson, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The appellant served on active duty from December 14, 1950 to April 23, 1951. This matter comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from multiple decision letters, dated between February 2012 and July 2012, from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center (VAMC) in Jackson, Mississippi, which denied reimbursement for unauthorized medical expenses incurred between January 15, 2012 and January 16, 2012 at Citrus Memorial Hospital. See September 2012 Notice of Disagreement. FINDING OF FACT In September 2013, the Board was notified that the appellant had died on August [redacted], 2013. CONCLUSION OF LAW Due to the death of the appellant, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this claim at this time. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2013); but see Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION Unfortunately, the appellant died on August [redacted], 2013, during the pendency of his appeal. As a matter of law, appellants' claims do not survive their deaths. Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the appellant and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2013). In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the appellant. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1106 (2013). The Board's dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion. Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the appellant's death. See Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008) (creating new 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, substitution in case of death of a claimant who dies on or after October 10, 2008). As provided for in this new provision, a person eligible for substitution will include "a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under section 5121(a) of this title ...." The Secretary will be issuing regulations governing the rules and procedures for substitution upon death. Until such regulations are issued, an eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the claimant should file a request for substitution with the VA facility from which the claim originated (listed on the first page of this decision). ORDER The appeal is dismissed. Mark D. Hindin Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs