Citation Nr: 1332768 Decision Date: 10/21/13 Archive Date: 10/24/13 DOCKET NO. 10-34 110 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Louisville, Kentucky THE ISSUE Entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a back disability. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Veteran ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD K. Haddock, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran had active military service from July 1962 to January 1968. This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a February 2010 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Louisville, Kentucky. In connection with this appeal, the Veteran testified at a videoconference hearing before a Veterans Law Judge in November 2011 and accepted that hearing in lieu of an in-person hearing before a Veterans Law Judge. A transcript of that hearing is associated with the claims file. FINDING OF FACT Before the Board promulgated a decision in this appeal, the Veteran died on April [redacted], 2013. CONCLUSION OF LAW Because of the death of the Veteran, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal at this time. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2013); Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION Unfortunately, the appellant died during the pendency of the appeal. As a matter of law, appellants' claims do not survive their deaths. Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42 (1994). This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the appellant and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2013). In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the Veteran. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1106 (2013). The Board's dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion. Any request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the appellant's death. Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008) (creating 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, substitution in case of death of a claimant who dies on or after October 10, 2008). As provided for in that new provision, a person eligible for substitution includes a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under 38 U.S.C.A. § 5121(a). Any eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the claimant should file a request for substitution with the RO from which the claim originated, listed on the first page of this decision. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. ____________________________________________ Harvey P. Roberts Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs