Citation Nr: 1334081 Decision Date: 10/28/13 Archive Date: 11/06/13 DOCKET NO. 13-05 847 ) DATE ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Oakland, California THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for a right eye disability. 2. Entitlement to service connection for major depression. REPRESENTATION Veteran represented by: California Department of Veterans Affairs ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD N. L. Northcutt, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran, who is the appellant, served on active duty from April 1985 to April 1989. The Veteran died in June 2013. This matter is before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal of a rating decision in April 2012 of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). FINDING OF FACT According to the records of the Social Security Administration , the Veteran died in June 2013, while her appeal of the claims of service connection for a right eye disability and for major depression were pending before the Board. CONCLUSION OF LAW Due to the death of the Veteran, the Board has no jurisdiction to review the appeal of the claims of service connection for a right eye disability and for major depression. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2012). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION In the absence of evidence to the contrary, a finding of fact of death made by another Federal agency will be accepted as proof of death. 38 C.F.R. § 3.211(g). According to the records of the Social Security Administration, a Federal agency, the Veteran died in June 2013. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board accepts the finding by the Social Security Administration as proof of the Veteran's death during the pendency of the appeal and before the Board promulgated a final decision on the claims of service connection for a right eye disability and for major depression. As the Veteran died during the pendency of the appeal, as a matter of law, the appeal does not survive the Veteran's death, and the appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2013); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 53-54 (1994). The Board's dismissal of the appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion. Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the Veteran's death. Veterans Benefits Improvements Act of 2008, Pub. L. No.110-3889, § 212, 112 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2009) (creating new 38 U.S.C.A. § 5121A, substitution in case of death of a claimant who dies on or as of October 10, 2008). As provided for in this new provision, a person eligible for substitution will include a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under 38 U.S.C.A. § 5121(a). The Secretary of VA will be issuing regulations governing the rules and procedures for substitution upon death. Until such regulations are issued, an eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the Veteran should file a request for substitution with the VA regional office from which the claim originated, which is listed on the first page of this decision. ORDER The appeal of the claims of service connection for a right eye disability and for major depression is dismissed. George E. Guido Jr. Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs