Citation Nr: 1336852 Decision Date: 11/13/13 Archive Date: 11/26/13 DOCKET NO. 08-22 743 ) DATE ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St. Petersburg, Florida THE ISSUE Entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 20 percent for degenerative disc disease with herniation L4, L5, and S1, and limitation of lumbar spine motion. REPRESENTATION Veteran represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Laura E. Collins, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from October 1985 to June 1995. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal of an April 2005 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in St. Petersburg, Florida that confirmed and continued a rating of 20 percent for degenerative disc disease with herniation L4, L5, and S1, and limitation of lumbar spine motion. By way of background, a February 2003 rating decision denied a rating in excess of 20 percent for the Veteran's lumbar spine condition. The Veteran did not file a notice of disagreement with the February 2003 rating decision and no additional evidence pertinent to the issue was physically or constructively associated with the claims folder within one year of the rating decision. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.156(b) (2013); Bond v. Shinseki, 659 F.3d 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2011); see also Buie v. Shinseki, 24 Vet. App. 242, 251-52 (2010). Thus, the February 2003 rating decision became final based on the evidence then of record. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 7104, 7105 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1105 (2013). In October 2011 the Board remanded the claim for additional development. FINDING OF FACT On October 16, 2013, the Board received word that the Veteran died in July 2013. CONCLUSION OF LAW Due to the death of the Veteran, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this claim at this time. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2013); but see Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION Unfortunately, the Veteran died during the pendency of the appeal. As a matter of law, appellants' claims do not survive their deaths. Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the Veteran and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2013). In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the Veteran. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1106 (2013). The Board's dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion. Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the Veteran's death. See Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-389, § 212, 122 Stat. 4145, 4151 (2008) (creating new 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, substitution in case of death of a claimant who dies on or after October 10, 2008). As provided for in this new provision, a person eligible for substitution will include "a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under section 5121(a) of this title ...." The Secretary will be issuing regulations governing the rules and procedures for substitution upon death. Until such regulations are issued, an eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the claimant should file a request for substitution with the VA RO from which the claim originated (listed on the first page of this decision). (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) ORDER The appeal is dismissed. MICHAEL E. KILCOYNE Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs