Citation Nr: 1552001 Decision Date: 12/11/15 Archive Date: 12/16/15 DOCKET NO. 10-35 703 ) DATE ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St. Petersburg, Florida THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for residuals of a low back disability. 2. Entitlement to service connection for residuals of a left eye injury. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL The Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD C. Samuelson, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran had active service from January 1969 to December 1970. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from June 2009 and July 2010 rating decisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in St. Petersburg, Florida. In July 2011, the Veteran testified by videoconference at a hearing before the undersigned Veterans Law Judge (VLJ). A transcript of that hearing is of record. The Board previously considered this appeal in August 2013 and remanded the claim for additional development. FINDING OF FACT On December 9, 2015, the Board was notified by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office, St. Petersburg, Florida, that the appellant died in October 2015. CONCLUSION OF LAW Due to the death of the appellant, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal at this time. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2015). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION Unfortunately, the appellant died during the pendency of the appeal. As a matter of law, appellants' claims do not survive their deaths. Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the appellant and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2015). In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the Veteran. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1106 (2015). The Board's dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion. Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the appellant's death. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 5121A (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(b) (2015). A person eligible for substitution includes "a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under section 5121(a) of this title ...." 38 U.S.C.A. § 5121A (West 2014); see 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(a) (2015). An eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the claimant should file a request for substitution with the VA office from which the claim originated (listed on the first page of this decision). 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(b) (2015). ORDER The appeal is dismissed. STEVEN D. REISS Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs