Citation Nr: 1605040 Decision Date: 02/10/16 Archive Date: 02/18/16 DOCKET NO. 10-41 177 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Phoenix, Arizona THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss. WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL Appellant ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD Elizabeth Jalley, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from October 1995 to October 1999, from February 2005 to September 2005, and from November 2005 to November 2007. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an August 2008 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Phoenix, Arizona. A notice of disagreement was received in July 2009, a statement of the case was issued in August 2010, and a substantive appeal was received in October 2010. In November 2015, the Veteran testified at a personal hearing before the undersigned Veterans Law Judge. A transcript of this hearing was prepared and associated with the claims file. FINDING OF FACT In November 2015, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Veteran testified at her Board hearing that she was withdrawing her pending appeal. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2015). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 2014). An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2015). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. In the present case, the appellant has withdrawn the appeal of the claim of entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss. This withdrawal was made at the November 2015 Board hearing and was reduced to writing in the hearing transcript. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204(a),(b) . Hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration on this issue. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal, and it is dismissed. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. ____________________________________________ DEBORAH W. SINGLETON Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs