Citation Nr: 1606735 Decision Date: 02/23/16 Archive Date: 03/01/16 DOCKET NO. 12-14 463 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in St. Petersburg, Florida THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to service connection for left knee degenerative joint disease, to include as secondary to service-connected right knee meniscectomy. 2. Entitlement to service connection for left hip degenerative joint disease, to include as secondary to service-connected right knee meniscectomy. REPRESENTATION Veteran represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD S. Mishalanie, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from January 1965 to June 1968. This case initially came before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a December 2009 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in St. Petersburg, Florida. In October 2014, the Board remanded the case to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ) for additional development. The claims have since been returned to the Board for further appellate review. This appeal was processed using the Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS) and the Virtual VA paperless claims processing systems. Any future consideration of this Veteran's case must take into consideration the existence of these electronic records. FINDING OF FACT Prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Veteran died in September 2015. CONCLUSION OF LAW Due to the death of the Veteran, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal at this time. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2015). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION Unfortunately, the appellant died during the pendency of the appeal. As a matter of law, appellants' claims do not survive their deaths. Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994). This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the appellant and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 7104(a) (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302 (2015). In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the Veteran. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1106 (2015). The Board's dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion. Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the appellant's death. See 38 U.S.C.A. § 5121A (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(b) (2015). A person eligible for substitution includes "a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under section 5121(a) of this title ...." 38 U.S.C.A. § 5121A (West 2014); see 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(a) (2015). An eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the claimant should file a request for substitution with the VA office from which the claim originated (listed on the first page of this decision). 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(b) (2015). ORDER The appeal is dismissed. K. MILLIKAN Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs