Citation Nr: 1635336 Decision Date: 09/09/16 Archive Date: 09/20/16 DOCKET NO. 12-17 605 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Nashville, Tennessee THE ISSUE Entitlement to an increased initial rating for coronary artery disease currently evaluated as 60 percent disabling, including a total rating based on individual unemployability. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: The American Legion ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD N. Snyder, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from February 1970 to September 1971. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) from a June 2011 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). The record before the Board consists of the Veteran's electronic records in Virtual VA and the Veterans Benefits Management System. The appeal is REMANDED to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ). VA will notify the appellant if further action is required. REMAND The Veteran was most recently afforded a VA "heart" examination in October 2010. In argument submitted to the Board in August 2016, the representative asserted that the disability has worsened since that examination. Therefore, the Board has determined that the Veteran should be afforded another VA examination to determine the current degree of severity of the coronary artery disease. Additionally, the record indicates that the Veteran receives benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA). See January 2011 VA examination record (reflecting history of SSA benefits). Records in the possession of the SSA could be supportive of the appellant's claim. Thus, further development to obtain those records is in order. Accordingly, this case is REMANDED to the RO or the Appeals Management Center (AMC), in Washington, D.C., for the following actions: 1. Undertake appropriate development to obtain a copy of any SSA disability determination(s) for the Veteran and a copy of the records associated with any such determination(s). 2. Undertake appropriate development to obtain all pertinent, outstanding medical records. 3. Afford the Veteran a VA examination to determine the current degree of severity of the service-connected coronary artery disease. All pertinent evidence of record should be made available to and reviewed by the examiner. Any indicated studies should be performed. Ensure that the examiner provides all information required for rating purposes, including an assessment of the impact on occupational functioning. 4. Then, readjudicate the claim for increased rating, including based on individual unemployability. If the benefit sought on appeal is not granted to the Veteran's satisfaction, provide the Veteran and his representative with a supplemental statement of the case and afford them the requisite opportunity to respond before the case is returned to the Board for further appellate action. The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matter the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board of Veterans' Appeals or by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West 2014). _________________________________________________ T. REYNOLDS Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 2014), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2016).