Citation Nr: 1751078 Decision Date: 11/08/17 Archive Date: 11/17/17 DOCKET NO. 17-22 130A ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Winston-Salem, North Carolina THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an initial rating in excess of 50 percent for a psychiatric disability. 2. Entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to a service-connected disability (TDIU). ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD T. M. Gillett, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran had active service from January 1973 to February 1979. These matters come before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from an August 2016 rating decision of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). This appeal has been advanced on the Board's docket pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 20.900(c) (2017). 38 U.S.C.A. § 7107(a)(2) (West 2014). REMAND In a September 2017 letter, the Veteran reported that his service-connected psychiatric disability symptoms had intensified recently due to financial and medical difficulties. As the Veteran suggests that the symptoms recently have been worsening, a remand is necessary to provide an additional VA psychiatric examination to determine the severity of the Veteran's psychiatric disability symptomatology. As the claim of entitlement to TDIU is inextricably intertwined with the claim for a higher initial rating for a psychiatric disability, that issue must also be remanded. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: This appeal has been advanced on the Board's docket pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 20.900(c). Expedited handling is requested. 1. After obtaining any necessary releases, obtain and associate with the claims file all outstanding records of treatment for the service-connected psychiatric disability. Associate all records or responses received with the record. All efforts to obtain records should be fully documented. At a minimum, obtain all outstanding VA records. 2. Then, schedule the Veteran for a VA psychiatric examination with a qualified examiner to determine the current severity of the service-connected psychiatric disability. The examiner must review the claims file and should note that review in the report. The examiner should make specific findings as to the extent and frequency of all psychiatric symptoms. The examiner also should provide a full multi-axial diagnosis. Finally, the examiner should describe the impact of the Veteran's service-connected psychiatric disability on occupational and social functioning, and should describe the symptoms resulting in those levels of impairment. The examiner should also provide an opinion as to whether the Veteran is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation by reason of the service-connected psychiatric disability, considering his training, education, and work experience, but not age or nonservice-connected disability. If the Veteran is felt capable of work despite the service-connected disability, the examiner should state what type of work and what accommodations would be necessary due to the service-connected disability. 3. Then, readjudicate the claims on appeal. If any decision is adverse to the Veteran, issue a supplemental statement of the case and allow the appropriate time for response. Then, return the case to the Board. The Veteran has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherousky v. West, 12 Vet. App. 369 (1999). These claims must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that all claims that are remanded by the Board or the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims for additional development or other appropriate action must be handled in an expeditious manner. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5109B, 7112 (West 2014). _________________________________________________ Harvey P. Roberts Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Under 38 U.S.C.A. § 7252 (West 2014), only a decision of the Board of Veterans' Appeals is appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. This remand is in the nature of a preliminary order and does not constitute a decision of the Board on the merits of your appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1100(b) (2017).