Citation Nr: 1753922	
Decision Date: 11/27/17    Archive Date: 12/07/17

DOCKET NO.  13-33 365	)	DATE
	)
	)

On appeal from the decision of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Seattle, Washington


THE ISSUES

1.  Entitlement to service connection for allergic rhinitis.

2.  Entitlement to service connection for a right ankle disorder.

3.  Entitlement to service connection for a left ankle disorder.

4.  Entitlement to service connection for ulnar neuropathy.  

5.  Entitlement to service connection for acquired psychiatric disorder, to include anxiety, depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).


REPRESENTATION

Veteran represented by:	Disabled American Veterans



ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD

Tahirih S. Samadani, Counsel


INTRODUCTION

The Veteran had active service from December 1985 to December 1989, June 2007 to October 2007, and March 2008 to September 2009.  He also served in the Army National Guard.

This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) from a May 2010 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Seattle, Washington.

The Veteran's claims file is a "paperless" claims file.  All records in the Veteran's case are maintained in Virtual VA and Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS).


FINDINGS OF FACT

1.  The Veteran in this case served on active duty from December 1985 to December 1989, June 2007 to October 2007, and March 2008 to September 2009.

2.  On May 19, 2016, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the appellant that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested.


CONCLUSION OF LAW

The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran have been met.  38 U.S.C. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (2012); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2017).

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION

The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed.  38 U.S.C. § 7105 (2012).  An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision.  38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2017).  Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative.  38 C.F.R. § 20.204.  In the present case, the Veteran has withdrawn this appeal and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration.  Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed.


ORDER

The appeal is dismissed.




		
	KRISTI L. GUNN
Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals




Department of Veterans Affairs