Citation Nr: 18140406
Decision Date: 10/03/18	Archive Date: 10/03/18

DOCKET NO. 14-29 205A
DATE:	October 3, 2018
ORDER
The claim of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 30 percent for coronary artery disease (claimed as ischemic heart disease) is dismissed.
The claim of entitlement to a compensable evaluation for erectile dysfunction is dismissed.
The claim of entitlement to a compensable evaluation for diabetic neuropathy with hypertension is dismissed.
The claim of entitlement to a compensable evaluation for onychomycosis is dismissed.
The claim of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus is dismissed.
The claim of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity for the period prior to June 14, 2012, in excess of 20 percent effective June 14, 2012, and in excess of 30 percent since August 2, 2017, is dismissed.
The claim of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for peripheral neuropathy of the right upper extremity for the period prior to June 14, 2012, in excess of 20 percent effective June 14, 2012, and in excess of 40 percent since August 2, 2017, is dismissed.
The claim of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 20 percent for peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity for the period prior to April 10, 2014, and in excess of 40 percent since April 10, 2014, is dismissed.
The claim of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 20 percent for peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity for the period prior to April 10, 2014, and in excess of 40 percent since April 10, 2014, is dismissed.
The claim of entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 70 percent for posttraumatic stress disorder and depressive order, not otherwise specified (NOS), is dismissed.
The claim of entitlement to an earlier effective date for Dependents' Educational Assistance is dismissed.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The Veteran in this case served on active duty from August 1967 to July 1970.
2. On August 9, 2018, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
The criteria for withdrawal of appeals by the Veteran have been met.  38 U.S.C. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (2012); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2018).

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION
The Veteran had honorable active duty service with the United States Army from August 1967 to July 1970.
The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed.  38 U.S.C. § 7105 (2012).  An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision.  38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2018).  Withdrawal may be made by the veteran or by his or her authorized representative.  38 C.F.R. § 20.204.  In the present case, the Veteran has withdrawn this appeal in an August 2018 correspondence and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration.  Specifically, the Veteran indicated that he “WOULD LIKE TO WITHDRAW ANY PENDING APPEALS BEFORE THE BOARD…”.  
Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed.
 
B. MULLINS
Veterans Law Judge
Board of Veterans’ Appeals
ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD	H. Fisher, Associate Counsel