Citation Nr: 18142685
Decision Date: 10/17/18	Archive Date: 10/16/18

DOCKET NO. 16-30 593
DATE:	October 17, 2018
ORDER
The appeal is dismissed.
FINDING OF FACT
In June 2018, prior to the promulgation of a decision by the Board, the Veteran, through his representative, withdrew his appeal.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran have been met.  38 U.S.C. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204.
REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION
The Veteran served on active duty from November 1965 to August 1968.  This matter comes before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) on appeal from a November 2013 rating decision issued by a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO).  
Entitlement to compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for benign prostatic hypertrophy, claimed as residual of testosterone injections, and/or as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II. 
The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed.  38 U.S.C. § 7105.  An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision.  38 C.F.R. § 20.204.  Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. Id.  
In June 2018, prior to the promulgation of a decision by the Board, the Veteran, through his representative, withdrew his appeal as to the aforementioned issue.  Consequently, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration.  Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed. 
 
A. JAEGER
Veterans Law Judge
Board of Veterans’ Appeals
ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD	Koria B. Stanton, Associate Counsel