Citation Nr: 1829901 Decision Date: 10/03/18 Archive Date: 10/19/18 DOCKET NO. 16-16 209 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Indianapolis, Indiana THE ISSUE Entitlement to basic eligibility to Chapter 35 Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits. REPRESENTATION Appellant represented by: Disabled American Veterans ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD John Kitlas, Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty in the United States Army from April 1969 to November 1970. This matter is before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a July 2014 rating decision by a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) which, in pertinent part, found that basic eligibility to DEA benefits was not established. FINDINGS OF FACT Prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran via a November 2016 statement that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran have been met. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2017). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 2014). An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2017). Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. In the present case, the Veteran submitted a statement in November 2016 that he wanted to withdraw his appeal as to his claim for DEA benefits. His accredited representative also submitted a motion to withdraw the appeal in September 2018 noting the Veteran had expressed his desire to withdraw the appeal in that November 2016 statement. Consequently, the Veteran has withdrawn this appeal and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. STEVEN D. REISS Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs