Citation Nr: 1807158 Decision Date: 02/05/18 Archive Date: 02/14/18 DOCKET NO. 12-04 564 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Winston-Salem, North Carolina THE ISSUES 1. Entitlement to an effective date earlier than July 18, 2003, for the award of service connection for depression (psychosis). 2. Entitlement to a disability evaluation in excess of 10 percent for depression (psychosis). 3. Entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU). REPRESENTATION Veteran represented by: North Carolina Department of Veterans' Affairs ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD R. I. Sims, Associate Counsel INTRODUCTION The Veteran served on active duty from October 1977 to July 1980. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from several rating decisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Cleveland, Ohio. A December 2008 rating decision granted service connect for major depression (claimed as depressive psychosis, MDD). A September 2013 rating decision denied entitlement to a TDIU. FINDING OF FACT On December 7, 2017, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran, through his authorized representative, that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (2012); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2017). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C. § 7105. An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.204. In the present case, the Veteran, through his authorized representative, has withdrawn this appeal and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed. ORDER The appeal is dismissed. Thomas H. O'Shay Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs