Citation Nr: 20002965 Decision Date: 01/14/20 Archive Date: 01/14/20 DOCKET NO. 17-04 278 DATE: January 14, 2020 ORDER The appeal for entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities (TDIU) is dismissed. FINDING OF FACT On October 25, 2019, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) received notification from the Veteran, through his authorized representative, which indicated that a withdrawal of the issue on appeal is requested. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran and his authorized representative have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 20.205.   REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The Veteran had honorable active duty service with the United States Army from May 2004 to September 2004, and from August 2006 to July 2007. The Board notes that in his January 2017 substantive appeal, the Veteran requested a hearing. Accordingly, the Veteran was scheduled for a Board hearing in November 2019. In October 2019, the Veteran withdrew his request for a hearing. Dismissal The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C. § 7105. An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.205. Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.205. In the present case, by way of an October 2019 correspondence, the Veteran, through his representative, withdrew this appeal and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed. B. MULLINS Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board Y. MacDonald, Associate Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential, and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.