Citation Nr: 20004131 Decision Date: 01/16/20 Archive Date: 01/16/20 DOCKET NO. 16-51 534 DATE: January 16, 2020 ORDER The appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for peripheral vascular disease is dismissed. The appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity is dismissed. The appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity is dismissed. The appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for tinnitus is dismissed. FINDING OF FACT On March 14, 2019, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the appellant that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the appellant have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105 (2012); 38 C.F.R. § 20.205 (2018). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The Veteran served honorably in the United States Army from March 1967 to October 1968. These issues come before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) on appeal from a April 2014 rating decision issued by a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C. § 7105. An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 20.205. Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 20.205. In the present case, the appellant has withdrawn his appeal of the aforementioned issues and, hence, there remains no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed. G. A. WASIK Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board J.T. Massey, Associate Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential, and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.