Citation Nr: 20008174
Decision Date: 01/30/20	Archive Date: 01/30/20

DOCKET NO. 14-28 183A
DATE: January 30, 2020

ORDER

Entitlement to service connection for a uterine disorder, to include as secondary to service-connected pubic scars and adhesions, is dismissed.

Entitlement to service connection for infertility, to include as secondary to service-connected pubic scars and adhesions, is dismissed.

FINDING OF FACT

In a December 2019 statement, which was each received prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Veteran withdrew her appeal on the issues of entitlement to service connection for a uterine disorder and infertility.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

The criteria for withdrawal of the appeal of the issues of entitlement to service connection for a uterine disorder and infertility, by the Veteran have been met.  38 U.S.C. § 7105 (b)(2), (d)(5) (2012); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2018).

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION

The Veteran served on active duty from July 1995 to February 2001.  These matters are on appeal from a September 2013 rating decision.

In May 2018 and June 2019, the Board remanded the claims for service connection for a uterine disorder and infertility for further development.

Withdrawal

The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed.  38 U.S.C. § 7105 (2012).  An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision.  38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2018).  Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative.  38 C.F.R. § 20.204.  Here, in a December 2019 statement, the Veteran withdrew the claims of entitlement to service connection for a uterine disorder and infertility.  Hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration regarding these claims, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review these claims, and they are dismissed.

 

 

KELLI A. KORDICH

Veterans Law Judge

Board of Veterans’ Appeals

Attorney for the Board	T. Adams, Counsel

The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential, and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.