Citation Nr: 21001558
Decision Date: 01/08/21	Archive Date: 01/08/21

DOCKET NO. 18-15 161
DATE: January 8, 2021

ORDER

Entitlement to service connection for hypertension is dismissed.

Entitlement to service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity is dismissed.

Entitlement to service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the right upper extremity is dismissed.

Entitlement to an increased rating for peripheral neuropathy of the left sciatic nerve is dismissed.

Entitlement to an increased rating for peripheral neuropathy of the right sciatic nerve is dismissed.

Entitlement to an increased rating for bilateral hearing loss is dismissed.

Entitlement to an increased rating for diabetic nephropathy is dismissed.

Entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities (TDIU) is dismissed.

Whether the effective date of October 1, 2016, assigned for the reduction of the disability rating for diabetic nephropathy was proper is dismissed.

FINDING OF FACT

In January 2021, the Board was notified that the appellant died in November 2020.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

Due to the death of the appellant, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal at this time.  38 U.S.C. § 7104(a); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302. 

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Unfortunately, the appellant died during the pendency of the appeal.  As a matter of law, appellants’ claims do not survive their deaths.  Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).  This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the appellant and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 38 U.S.C. § 7104(a); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302.   

In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the Veteran.  38 C.F.R. § 20.1106. 

The Board’s dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion.  Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the appellant’s death. 38 U.S.C. § 5121A; 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(b).  A person eligible for substitution includes “a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under section 5121(a) of this title ….” 38 U.S.C. § 5121A; 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(a).  

An eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the claimant should file a request for substitution with the VA office from which the claim originated. 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(b).  

 

 

M. Donohue

Veterans Law Judge

Board of Veterans’ Appeals

Attorney for the Board	Thomas D. Jones, Counsel

The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.