Citation Nr: 21002451 Decision Date: 01/13/21 Archive Date: 01/13/21 DOCKET NO. 14-03 072 DATE: January 13, 2021 ORDER The appeal regarding entitlement to an increased rating greater than 10 percent for lumbar fusion prior to October 1, 2010, 60 percent from October 1, 2010, and 40 percent from December 7, 2019 is dismissed. The appeal regarding entitlement to an increased rating greater than 10 percent for left hip bursitis is dismissed. The appeal regarding entitlement to an increased rating greater than 30 percent for hypertension with nephrolithiasis is dismissed. The appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for a right wrist disorder is dismissed. The appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is dismissed. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On May 19, 2020, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that he wished to withdrawal the appeal regarding entitlement to an increased rating greater than 10 percent for lumbar fusion prior to October 1, 2010, 60 percent from October 1, 2010, and 40 percent from December 7, 2019. 2. On May 19, 2020, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that he wished to withdrawal the appeal regarding entitlement to an increased rating greater than 10 percent for left hip bursitis. 3. On May 19, 2020, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that he wished to withdrawal the appeal regarding entitlement to an increased rating greater than 30 percent for hypertension with nephrolithiasis. 4. On May 19, 2020, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that he wished to withdrawal the appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for a right wrist disorder. 5. On May 19, 2020, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that he wished to withdrawal the appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for OSA. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The criteria for withdrawal of the appeal by the Veteran regarding entitlement to an increased rating greater than 10 percent for lumbar fusion prior to October 1, 2010, 60 percent from October 1, 2010, and 40 percent from December 7, 2019 have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. 2. The criteria for withdrawal of the appeal by the Veteran regarding entitlement to an increased rating greater than 10 percent for left hip bursitis have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. 3. The criteria for withdrawal of the appeal by the Veteran regarding entitlement to an increased rating greater than 30 percent for hypertension with nephrolithiasis have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. 4. The criteria for withdrawal of the appeal by the Veteran regarding entitlement to service connection for a right wrist disorder have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. 5. The criteria for withdrawal of the appeal by the Veteran regarding entitlement to service connection for OSA have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The Veteran served on active duty from June 1996 to January 2000. In May 2018, the Board remanded the issues on appeal to the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ). The AOJ issued a supplemental statement of the case (SSOC) as to those issues in April 2020. In a May 2020 communication, the Veteran stated he was “satisfied and wished to withdraw all remaining issues associated with this appeal.” See May 2020 Veteran withdrawal communication. The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C. § 7105. An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. Withdrawal may be made by the Veteran or by his authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. As stated above, the Veteran has withdrawn this appeal as to all issues. Hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. (Continued on the next page)   Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed. DONNIE R. HACHEY Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board M. Salazar, Associate Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.