Citation Nr: 21065529 Decision Date: 10/26/21 Archive Date: 10/26/21 DOCKET NO. 17-38 363 DATE: October 26, 2021 ORDER The appeal seeking entitlement to service connection for a seizure disorder is dismissed. FINDINGS OF FACT On July 27, 2020, the agency of original jurisdiction (AOJ) received explicit and unambiguous notification from the Veteran that he sought to withdraw his claim of entitlement to service connection for a seizure disorder. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of entitlement to service connection for a seizure disorder by the appellant (or his or her authorized representative) have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 20.205 (for AMA) § 19.55 (legacy). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The Veteran served honorably in the United States Army from March 1979 to June 1979. This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) from a March 2016 rating decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). This matter was remanded by the Board for further development in a March 2019 decision. Also remanded in the March 2019 decision was the issue of entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, to include a learning disability. However, that claim has since been granted in full during the pendency of the appeal. See April 2020 rating decision. Therefore, it is no longer on appeal and the Board will not address the issue further. Service Connection 1. Entitlement to service connection for a seizure disorder An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. Unless an appeal is withdrawn on the record at a hearing, appeal withdrawals must be in writing and must include the name of the Veteran, the name of the claimant or appellant if other than the Veteran, the applicable VA file number, and a statement that the appeal is withdrawn. If the appeal involves multiple issues, the withdrawal must specify that the appeal is withdrawn in its entirety or list the issue(s) withdrawn from the appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 19.55 (b)(1). Until the appeal is transferred to the Board, an appeal withdrawal is effective when received by the AOJ. 38 C.F.R. § 19.55 (b)(3). As noted above, in March 2019, the Board remanded the issues of entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and a seizure disorder. As a result of the additional development completed, in an April 2020 rating decision, the Veteran was awarded service connection for an unspecified psychotic disorder, rated 100 percent, effective October 30, 2008 (date of claim). Thereafter, on July 27, 2020, the Veteran submitted an Appeals Satisfaction Notice notifying the AOJ that he had received recent correspondence regarding the decision to grant one or more of his issues on appeal and based on the decision rendered, he was satisfied and "wish(ed) to withdraw all remaining issues associated with this appeal." The withdrawal is in writing and contains the Veteran's name, VA file number, and a statement indicating that the Veteran wished to withdraw his claims on appeal in their entirety. 38 C.F.R. § 19.55 (b)(1). Hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal of the matter seeking entitlement to service connection for a seizure disorder and it is dismissed. A. ISHIZAWAR Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans' Appeals Attorney for the Board Stuedemann, Angela L. The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.