Citation Nr: 21070615
Decision Date: 11/24/21	Archive Date: 11/24/21

DOCKET NO. 17-03 413
DATE: November 24, 2021

ORDER

The appeal concerning whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim for service connection for a low back disability is dismissed.

The appeal concerning entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction is dismissed.

The appeal concerning entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD is dismissed.

The appeal concerning entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 50 percent for bilateral pes planus, pes valgus, heel spurs and arthritis of the right foot is dismissed.

The appeal concerning entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 50 percent prior to March 19, 2021 for a sleep disorder is dismissed.

The appeal concerning entitlement to an evaluation in excess of 70 percent from March 19, 2021 for insomnia disorder with other medical comorbidity pes planus with plantar fasciitis, pes valgus and heel spurs and arthritis right foot is dismissed.

The appeal concerning entitlement to an effective date prior to July 16, 2014 for the assignment of a 50 percent evaluation for the service connected foot disabilities is dismissed.

The appeal concerning entitlement to TDIU prior to July 16, 2014 is dismissed.

FINDING OF FACT

On October 27, 2021, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran, through his authorized representative, that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran have been met.  38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55.

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION

(Continued on the next page)

 

The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed.  38 U.S.C. § 7105.  An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision.  38 C.F.R. § 19.55.  Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative.  38 C.F.R. § 19.55.  In the present case, the Veteran, through his authorized representative, has withdrawn this appeal and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration.  Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed.

 

 

H. SEESEL

Veterans Law Judge

Board of Veterans' Appeals

Attorney for the Board	R. Connally, Counsel

The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.